Sunday, November 25, 2012
Going Rogue
Boulder, CO is famously one of the most liberal places in America, and is also my home. About half-an-hour from downtown Boulder is another small, largely liberal town, Longmont, CO. Longmont doesn't typically feature in national debates about much of anything, even the attention drawn to the town due to CO's position as a swing state this election cycle was a bit of a surprise. This November changed things.
This November, Longmont passed Ballot Initiative 300, which made the process known as "fracking" illegal within city limits. The measure to put the ban in the city charter no less, passed with 60 percent of the vote. Longmont is not the first town to establish such measures, but its story is certainly remarkable. Over the past few years, the natural gas industry has been paying more attention to similar, citizen-initiated measures, which would piecemeal eliminate the development of new fracking sites. In Longmont , the natural gas industry invested heavily to defeat the measure - I've heard figures that range from between $300,000-$500,000 - in quantities that dwarf fundraising from grassroots advocacy groups.
Criticism of Ballot Initiative 300 has focused on its inability to stand up to the inevitable wave of litigation from the natural gas industry, state, and federal government. The Daily Times Call quoted Governor John D. Hickenlooper in September 2012 saying, "'There's nothing worse than being a governor in a legal battle with one of your own municipalities,' he said. 'But I don't see any alternative.'"
It is unlikely that the initiative will be able to stand up in court; but despite its lack of long-term effectiveness, the initiative has other values. First, the ban is a new, unprecedented example of locally based action overcoming large industrial investment. Second, the ban has started new discussions, and rekindled existing debates over the expansion and development of fracking sites in and around residential areas. Finally, the success of the initiative means that both industry and various levels of government will have to start taking local concerns more seriously.
I believe Longmont's Ballot Initiative 300 is an appropriate response to an environmental issue because it uses existing leverage points to draw attention to environmental concerns, empower local communities, and demonstrate the power of grassroots organizing. Longmont, in passing such a measure, has to some extent gone rogue - instead of waiting for state and federal regulation of fracking, the city has struck out to determine its own future. Regardless of the long term success or failure of the initiative, Longmont's given me hope that even small, seemingly unimportant communities can make a big difference for environmental issues on the national stage.
Monday, November 12, 2012
United States-Indonesian Comprehensive Partnership
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=67613
The article outlines some positive results that
have emerged from the United States-Indonesia Comprehensive Partnership. It is
a long-term commitment between the two nations to address issues related to
security, economy, development, the environment, and education among other many
other issues. The Environment and Climate Change working group within the
partnership has tasked with the job of identifying opportunities of economic
growth for Indonesia while mitigating climate change. Some of the actions that
they have either implemented or in the process of implementing includes a
debt-for-nature swap in which the U.S. forgives a certain amount of Indonesian
debt in exchange for Indonesian commitments to protect forests and reduce gas
emissions from deforestation. Another program that is detailed in depth in the
article is the establishment of 450,00 hectares of marine protected areas. As
detailed in the article, one of the key areas of cooperation detailed in the
partnership was environmental cooperation. The sustainable marine reserve park
is a prime example of an effective and replicable response to an environmental
challenge. The most important development that came out of the initiative was
the transfer of responsibility for maintaining and monitoring the reserve from
government officials to local fisherman whose livelihood were directly affected
by the success of the reserve.
Environmental issues are often stalled in the
international arena; the Kyoto protocol, and most recently the Copenhagen
Summit in 2011—the latest international attempt in addressing leading
environmental issues—did not produce significant deliverables in the global
campaign against climate change. The environmental provisions in the United
States-Indonesia Comprehensive Partnership, on the other hand, stand as
effective forms of action.
The provisions’ success (measured by the
concrete programs in place and level of current implementation) was possible
for a number of reasons. First is the political willingness of Indonesian
president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. Yudhoyono in the 2012 Rio Summit became
developing country leader that unilaterally pledged to reduce carbon emissions
by 25 percent by 2025. Indonesia’s success will reduce global emissions by 7%,
well ahead of the Millennium Development Goal’s requirements. Moreover, by
accepting Indonesia’s role as the world’s third largest carbon emitter,
Yudhoyono has effectively reversed the traditional developing country stance of
blaming the west regarding environmental issues.
Second, the reason plans extended into the
implementation phase was the way international environmental groups, United
States agencies and donors such as Norway made this possible was by framing
environmental concerns as a security concern; Along Indonesia’s coastal areas,
residents derive 70% of their protein from fish. Thus, for the Indonesian
government, protecting maritime resources became intertwined with the economic
livelihood and security of their citizens. Moreover, protecting natural
resources fell within ASEAN goals of regional integration.
Lastly, Indonesia’s growing economy makes renewable energy, green and
blue markets desirable sectors for investment. Thus, it was within the
Indonesia’s best interest to boost their economy by focusing on environmentally
friendly sectors.
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Sports, Development, and the Environment
While browsing the projects on the recommended "World Changing" website, I was intrigued by the "Stadium/Sports facility" tab. As a lifelong athlete, I am a huge proponent of sports of a means of social and community development. Involving youth in sports is enormously beneficial to their personal growth and can also prevent them from getting involved in detrimental activities such as drug use, crime, etc. From a community perspective, sports can provide a unifying effect whether through a team to root for or a place to gather. I had, however, never considered that the construction of a stadium or other athletic facility could be an environmental project until I stumbled across this project: http://openarchitecturenetwork.org/projects/esperance
The link above provides the description for a soccer stadium/community center in Kimisagara, Rwanda. This project is part of FIFA's larger Football for Hope campaign which broadly aims to provide health, educational, and economic opportunities for disadvantaged youth especially but to the community as whole through the context of sport. The Kimisagara pitch is located on the the campus of a primary school, and in addition to offering a space to play soccer/football in both an organized and unorganized fashion, the space offers classes on healthcare and other issues, a library, a healthcare center, and a space for microcredit and other informal economic activities. As such, the program has a clear social and economic development focus.
Admittedly, Football for Hope does not have a strict environmental focus, but the movement emphasizes sustainable development and constructs facilities in a manner to minimize environmental impact. The Kimisagara stadium, for instance, was constructed largely with local materials, minimizing transportation costs (both monetary and environmental); has a rainwater collection system to provide water for the facility; has planted trees throughout the facility; and is constructed in a manner to make it so air conditioning is unnecessary. Another Football for Hope facility being constructed in Nairobi, Kenya uses power generated by wind turbines and includes a community garden. These projects represent the type of sustainable development that allows underdeveloped countries the opportunity to develop without having the same detrimental impact that traditional development/industrialization has had.
Football for Hope, fittingly, gives me hope because it addresses a number of developmental issues including economic initiatives as well as education. Further, it centers around sports, which I love, and is a fantastic example of corporate social responsibility. As an aside, this type of project is the reason why I objected to the absolute anti-corporate stance of the "Story of Stuff" video that we watched in class a while back. Large corporations such as FIFA have enormous potential and the financial resources to engage in sustainable development. A major issue with many development projects is that they are not sustainable due to financial constraints. Football for Hope, because it is bankrolled by FIFA, is more likely to avoid this problem.
Admittedly, Football for Hope does not have a strict environmental focus, but the movement emphasizes sustainable development and constructs facilities in a manner to minimize environmental impact. The Kimisagara stadium, for instance, was constructed largely with local materials, minimizing transportation costs (both monetary and environmental); has a rainwater collection system to provide water for the facility; has planted trees throughout the facility; and is constructed in a manner to make it so air conditioning is unnecessary. Another Football for Hope facility being constructed in Nairobi, Kenya uses power generated by wind turbines and includes a community garden. These projects represent the type of sustainable development that allows underdeveloped countries the opportunity to develop without having the same detrimental impact that traditional development/industrialization has had.
Football for Hope, fittingly, gives me hope because it addresses a number of developmental issues including economic initiatives as well as education. Further, it centers around sports, which I love, and is a fantastic example of corporate social responsibility. As an aside, this type of project is the reason why I objected to the absolute anti-corporate stance of the "Story of Stuff" video that we watched in class a while back. Large corporations such as FIFA have enormous potential and the financial resources to engage in sustainable development. A major issue with many development projects is that they are not sustainable due to financial constraints. Football for Hope, because it is bankrolled by FIFA, is more likely to avoid this problem.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
You're not supposed to be here...
Unfortunately, the only quote I could come up for a title with was from Game of Thrones, and it was from a very minor character, so the image associated with it would be lost. Regardless... with respect to this class I have recently geeked out about two things: Thorium and Aquaponics. I will always love thorium, I mean how can you not. It's great. Look at that electron cloud.
Aquaponics, my other new found love, represents a huge potential solution to a wide range of urban food roduction problems. This story specifically focuses on Eric Maundu, a trained industrial robotics technician, has taken to the growing trend among Do-it-Yourself tinkers and tried to grown food in barren, urban locations. Maundu has blended his electronic expertise with his interest in urban enrichment, by making color-powered, technology controlled farms to create food for the user.
http://faircompanies.com/videos/view/internet-food-arduino-based-urban-aquaponics-in-oakland/
I feel that this type of action represents a huge step forward in environmentally conscious action because unlike encouraging recycling or driving less, aquaponics puts much more tangible power and results into the hands of the users. People will be able to farm themselves, take their own produce and consume and sell with, without relying on the larger consumerist system. If all of the farms were to use Eric Maundu's technology, then the farms will only have an initial cost of supplies, water and solar cells, then the production is entirely out of the influence of large corporate, or public systems.
Because the supplies for an aquaponics farm do not require specialized equipment or skills to set up and run, I feel that this is an easily repeatable project. The only barrier would be the initial cost of setting up the project, but I see city grants taking care of some of these problems.
Projects like this give me a lot of hope, because I think that part of the reason there is so much apathy to environmental causes is that we have lost our connection to the land. In urban settings especially people hardly know what a tree is, let alone where food comes from. I believe that putting the land back into people's hands will rekindle their concern for the natural world.
Aquaponics, my other new found love, represents a huge potential solution to a wide range of urban food roduction problems. This story specifically focuses on Eric Maundu, a trained industrial robotics technician, has taken to the growing trend among Do-it-Yourself tinkers and tried to grown food in barren, urban locations. Maundu has blended his electronic expertise with his interest in urban enrichment, by making color-powered, technology controlled farms to create food for the user.
http://faircompanies.com/videos/view/internet-food-arduino-based-urban-aquaponics-in-oakland/
I feel that this type of action represents a huge step forward in environmentally conscious action because unlike encouraging recycling or driving less, aquaponics puts much more tangible power and results into the hands of the users. People will be able to farm themselves, take their own produce and consume and sell with, without relying on the larger consumerist system. If all of the farms were to use Eric Maundu's technology, then the farms will only have an initial cost of supplies, water and solar cells, then the production is entirely out of the influence of large corporate, or public systems.
Because the supplies for an aquaponics farm do not require specialized equipment or skills to set up and run, I feel that this is an easily repeatable project. The only barrier would be the initial cost of setting up the project, but I see city grants taking care of some of these problems.
Projects like this give me a lot of hope, because I think that part of the reason there is so much apathy to environmental causes is that we have lost our connection to the land. In urban settings especially people hardly know what a tree is, let alone where food comes from. I believe that putting the land back into people's hands will rekindle their concern for the natural world.
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Meditations
This question is so appropriate with only a few weeks before Thanksgiving. I have been so lucky in my life, having had a number of exhilarating experiences, isolated, in wonder with nature. Some of my favorite experiences have been out backpacking the Wind River Range in Wyoming, hiking around on the burren in Ireland, and climbing to the top of the highest waterfall in Australia to look down as the water literally turned into mist beneath us. I've been so lucky. When I search my memories for the most exhilarating/magical/thrilling experience, however, I keep coming back to a handful of experiences I had looking at trees back home in Colorado during the summer after Freshman year.
After finishing my first year of college I was so relieved to be going home. I took up a job with the Boulder County Youth Corps as a assistant forestry team leader for a group of 10 teenagers. We were responsible for pulling the slash and dried logs left in previous years by chainsaw teams, working to prevent wildfires in the front range. The task was grueling, but as the summer wore on, I became accustomed to it, and was able to appreciate my surroundings and the people I was working with. I remember in particular one afternoon at the end of a long, hot work day. It began to rain just before we had to head back home, and it crescendoed into a downpour. All 12 of us ran down the mountain to our van through the trees, covered in mud. When we made it out of the forest, laughing and trying not to trip on the uneven ground there was a rainbow to the East, and gilded clouds illuminated by the low sun.
Looking back, that summer was one of the most important times as I have tried to discover myself, and what I value. Working in the forest, interacting with nature every day with all its hardships and thrills, grounded me - bringing me back down from my DC/SIS rush. So, yes - nature is worth preserving. But it was not only the trees, the dirt, and the sun that made that summer (and every summer with the Youth Corps since then) so extraordinary; it was also the people I was with. Nature is best enjoyed with people, despite what the Thoreaus of the world might have you believe. The best part of nature is the fact that we are a dynamic part of it, something worth preserving because it unites us as all as something we depend on, and as a common denominator for humanity. The conservationist ideal of a sterile wilderness is misleading, because we can never see nature for what it truly is. Every time we engage with our natural surroundings we make new meanings of it by virtue of our presence. When we make such meaning alone, we learn about ourselves; but when we make sure meaning together, we learn about ourselves as a species.
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Jeju Island
I was born in the countryside of
Vietnam but I have only ever known the city landscape. You don’t really get
much interaction with nature in the city so I felt disconnected with the
natural environment. That changed when I studied abroad in South Korea in the
spring of my junior year. The most
enchanting and magical experience I have ever had with nature was on a weeklong
trip with friends to an island off of the Korean peninsula called Jeju Island. Jeju Island is famous in South Korea as
a popular spot for honeymoons. It is often labeled as the Hawaii of South
Korea. The island is particularly known for their sweet and unique breed of
oranges, called Hallabang, and scuba diving grandmothers. It is a tiny island
but it is packed with a variety of landscapes ranging from beaches to caves to mountains.
On my second day on the island, I
traveled by ferry to a small island off Jeju Island called Udo. Udo is 2.28
square miles and resembles the shape of a cow lying down. You can go through
the entire island on a motorbike in 1 hour (4 if you stopped to take pictures
and enjoy the scenery like I did). My friends and I did just that. We rented
ATVs and just took off on the island with little more than a cartoon map that I
found on the ferry. On the island, there were 3 beaches with different types of
sand – coral, white sand, and soft tan colored sand. Being on the coral sand
was amazing (although killer on the feet). The water was completely crystal
clear and just seemed to glisten in the bright but not overhearing sun. Being
from around the DC metropolitan area, I have been too accustomed to the murky
sand water in Ocean City, MD). I have never been in water that is so clear that
you can see your own feet! The beach seemed to stretch on for miles with only
the outline of Jeju Island visible in the background.
Standing on the pristine beach in
the warmth of sunshine was when it hit me. That’s when I thought about how
there are tons of little gems like this in the world. Although it seems like we
have conquered every surface of the Earth, there is still so much left that we
have yet to explore. Maybe it’s best if we leave it that way but standing on
that much made me realize that nature should be preserved. That beach was not
created overnight. It was formed through hundreds of years of the same repetitive
action. In our society, as long as you have money, you can create whatever you
want, even your own artificial beach. However, it will never have the same
sentimental value like something that has literally hundreds of years of
history and stories to tell.
I have always through I was a
cosmopolitan girl. The idea of living in a rural area makes me uncomfortable.
Even living in the suburbs is dreadful enough. I love skyscrapers, lights,
excitement, and activity. But being on that island made me want to stay and
slow down my pace of life. I wanted to enjoy the simpler things in life because
they may not be there in that perfect state forever given our increasingly
detrimental influence on the environment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)